Resource deficit behind BECE, WASSCE failures
President John Mahama and WAEC
The persistent poor performance of some candidates in the West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) cannot be explained simply by a lack of effort or commitment to learning, as large numbers of students enter and complete senior high school under conditions where the teachers, teaching and learning materials, laboratories, libraries, classrooms and other facilities required for effective learning are inadequate.
The problem begins much earlier than the final examination.
For a significant proportion of Ghanaian children, the educational journey starts in poorly resourced public basic schools, where inadequate classrooms, limited teaching and learning materials, insufficient teachers, weak libraries, inadequate ICT facilities and, in some cases, poor access to basic educational infrastructure create learning disadvantages long before the students sit the Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE).
Those disadvantages can follow them into senior high school.
Students who emerge from such environments with weak foundations in English Language, Mathematics, Science and other subjects are then placed in secondary schools that may themselves lack the resources required to close the learning gaps.
The result is a chain of disadvantage stretching from basic education to senior high school and eventually to WASSCE.
It is against this background that the intense competition for Category A schools, the relatively lower demand for Category B schools and the very low demand for Category C schools must be understood.
The latest placement figures reveal a secondary education system in which candidates and parents are not simply choosing schools on the basis of prestige. They are responding to significant differences in perceived academic quality, infrastructure, teacher availability, learning resources and examination outcomes.
The figures are striking.
The 94 Category A schools have 76,417 vacancies but 313,283 applicants, creating a gap of 236,866 applicants who cannot be accommodated.
Category B schools present almost the opposite situation. The 259 schools have 250,366 vacancies but only 176,614 applicants, leaving 73,752 spaces without corresponding demand.
The imbalance is greatest among Category C schools.
The 645 Category C schools have 468,625 vacancies against only 123,577 applicants, leaving 345,048 spaces that candidates have not shown sufficient interest in occupying.
The figures provide an important window into the choices of Ghanaian families.
Candidates are effectively saying that where they attend school matters.
And their choices are closely connected to the resources and academic environments they believe will give them the best chance of succeeding in WASSCE.
The problem starts at the basic level
The quality gap is not created entirely at the senior high school level. It begins in basic education.
A child who spends six years of primary education and three years of junior high school in a poorly resourced environment may arrive at the BECE without the same academic foundation as a child who has benefited from well-equipped classrooms, adequate teachers, libraries, ICT facilities, textbooks and other learning resources.
This creates unequal starting points.
When such students progress to senior high school, teachers must not only teach the senior high school curriculum but, in many cases, also help students overcome weaknesses accumulated during their basic education.
The pressure is particularly serious in core subjects.
English Language and Mathematics form the foundation for much of secondary education.
Weaknesses in reading, comprehension, writing, numeracy and problem-solving can affect performance across several subjects.
Science students face another challenge when they have had limited exposure to practical learning before entering senior high school.
Consequently, the WASSCE examination becomes the final point at which years of educational inequality become visible.
It is therefore misleading to attribute every poor result to candidates’ failure to study.
A candidate can study hard and still struggle if the learning environment does not provide the necessary support.
A student cannot conduct meaningful practical science lessons without functioning laboratory equipment.
A student cannot undertake effective independent research where library resources are inadequate.
A teacher cannot provide effective individual attention when staffing levels are insufficient and class sizes are excessive.
And students cannot be expected to acquire the same breadth of digital skills when access to functional ICT laboratories differs significantly from one school to another.
Why Category A schools are highly sought after
The overwhelming demand for Category A schools reflects this reality.
Only 94 schools fall into the Category A group, yet they have attracted 313,283 applicants for 76,417 available places.
That means 236,866 applicants are competing for places that do not exist.
The attraction is largely explained by the characteristics associated with these institutions.
Category A schools are generally recognised for consistently strong WASSCE performance.
For parents and candidates, a history of high examination performance is powerful evidence that the school has an academic environment capable of producing good results.
But examination results are only one part of the attraction.
These schools also tend to have better-established educational infrastructure.
Large libraries provide students with access to books and other learning materials.
Science laboratories allow students to supplement classroom theory with practical work.
ICT laboratories provide access to computers and digital learning resources.
Adequate classrooms and comparatively spacious dormitories can also contribute to a more conducive learning environment.
These facilities matter because education is not simply the transfer of information from a teacher to a student.
The quality of learning depends on the environment in which that interaction takes place.
A student learning physics, chemistry or biology requires opportunities for practical work.
A student preparing for WASSCE requires access to past questions, reference materials and opportunities for independent study.
A student in an increasingly digital economy needs exposure to ICT.
Where these resources exist in abundance, students have more opportunities to reinforce what they learn in the classroom.
Teachers make the difference
Staffing is another major factor behind the attraction of Category A schools.
Such institutions generally have adequate numbers of professional and highly qualified teaching and non-teaching staff.
Adequate staffing means students are more likely to receive regular lessons, academic supervision and support.
It also reduces the possibility that a school will be severely affected when individual teachers leave or when particular subjects require additional instructional support.
This is particularly important for students who enter senior high school with weak academic foundations.
A well-resourced school can provide additional classes, remedial instruction, extra academic support and closer monitoring of students.
In contrast, a school already struggling with teacher shortages may find it difficult to provide such interventions.
This creates an important distinction between having a curriculum and having the capacity to deliver it effectively.
Ghana may have a national curriculum and a common WASSCE examination, but students do not necessarily experience that curriculum under identical conditions.
The Category A advantage becomes self-reinforcing
The popularity of Category A schools can also create a cycle that reinforces their advantage.
Because the schools are highly subscribed, they attract some of the strongest BECE candidates.
Because they attract strong candidates, their examination results are more likely to remain competitive. Strong results strengthen their reputation.
The stronger reputation attracts even more candidates. The cycle then continues.
This does not mean that students in Category A schools succeed simply because they are naturally more capable.
Rather, the schools often begin with academically strong students and combine that student profile with comparatively strong infrastructure, staffing and learning resources.
The combination creates a powerful academic environment.
The CSSPS structure reinforces the competition because candidates are typically permitted to select a maximum of two Category A schools.
With hundreds of thousands of applicants pursuing fewer than 77,000 places, the competition becomes intense.
Category B schools: capacity without equivalent demand
Category B schools occupy the middle of this hierarchy.
There are 259 Category B schools, offering 250,366 vacancies.
However, only 176,614 applicants have expressed interest, leaving 73,752 spaces available without corresponding demand.
This is important because Category B schools should not be regarded as poor-performing institutions simply because they are less popular than Category A schools.
Many maintain solid and consistent WASSCE results and remain academically competitive.
They generally attract students with strong-to-above-average BECE performance, with many schools operating around aggregate scores of 10 to 25, depending on the institution and admission year.
Their facilities are also generally adequate.
They possess standard learning and boarding facilities, ICT laboratories and conventional science laboratories.
The principal difference is that they may not have the same level of sophisticated infrastructure, equipment, academic reputation or national prestige associated with Category A institutions.
That distinction influences parental choices. For many parents, the decision is not simply whether a school is good.
It is whether the school is perceived to be the best available option.
Consequently, a Category B school can be academically sound and still lose applicants to Category A institutions.
Perception and reality
The demand figures therefore reveal an important perception gap.
A school may have sufficient teachers, functioning laboratories and a respectable WASSCE record, but if parents believe another institution offers better opportunities, demand will remain lower.
Category B schools consequently represent an important opportunity for the education system.
They already possess many of the characteristics required for effective secondary education.
Targeted investment in laboratories, libraries, ICT facilities, accommodation and staffing could further improve their competitiveness.
If their academic performance improves alongside infrastructure, their public image could also change.
Category C schools carry the heaviest burden
The most difficult situation exists at the Category C level.
The country has 645 Category C schools, far more than either Category A or Category B institutions. Together, they offer 468,625 vacancies.
Yet only 123,577 applicants have expressed interest.
That leaves 345,048 vacancies without corresponding demand. The numbers tell a powerful story.
There are more than six times as many Category C schools as Category A schools, and they collectively have more than six times the number of Category A vacancies.
Yet the demand is dramatically lower. The reasons are closely linked to the characteristics of many of these institutions.
Category C schools have mixed academic outcomes, with WASSCE performance ranging from average to low-performing, although some institutions are improving rapidly.
Many face inconsistent funding and infrastructure challenges. Some lack advanced science laboratories, well-equipped libraries and adequate dormitories.
Others operate with incomplete or inadequate school infrastructure.
These conditions affect the learning environment and can make it more difficult for teachers to deliver the curriculum effectively.
The teacher retention problem
Staffing presents another challenge. Teaching consistency can be disrupted by systemic staffing difficulties, particularly in schools located in rural and peri-urban communities.
Teacher retention can be difficult where adequate accommodation is unavailable.
A school may recruit a qualified teacher, but if that teacher is unable to secure suitable accommodation or faces difficult working conditions, retaining the teacher becomes a challenge.
This can create instability in instruction. Students require continuity.
If teachers are frequently transferred, leave or cannot be replaced quickly, students can lose valuable instructional time.
The problem is particularly serious in subjects where qualified teachers are already scarce.
The vicious cycle facing Category C schools
The difficulties confronting Category C schools can create a self-reinforcing cycle similar to, but in the opposite direction of, the Category A cycle.
Limited infrastructure can contribute to weaker learning conditions.
Weaker learning conditions can contribute to poorer academic outcomes.
Poor examination outcomes can damage the school’s reputation. A damaged reputation reduces demand.
Lower demand means fewer high-performing BECE candidates may choose the school.
The school then has to work harder to produce strong WASSCE results while operating with limited resources.
This creates what can be described as a cycle of educational disadvantage.
It is this cycle, rather than simply the intelligence or commitment of students, that must be addressed if Ghana is to substantially improve WASSCE performance.
Candidates from disadvantaged basic schools face double disadvantage
The problem becomes even more serious for students who enter Category C schools after attending poorly resourced public basic schools.
Such students may already have learning deficits when they arrive at senior high school.
If the secondary school is also inadequately resourced, there may be insufficient capacity to bridge those gaps.
The student is therefore disadvantaged twice. First, the student may have received an inadequate foundation at the basic level.
Second, the student may enter a senior high school without the facilities, teachers and academic support required to compensate for those weaknesses.
By the time the student sits WASSCE, the examination is measuring not only what was taught during the three years of senior high school but also the accumulated learning that the student has been able to acquire throughout the educational journey.
This is why improving WASSCE results requires interventions across the entire education chain.
Category C schools should not become “fallback schools”
The low demand for Category C schools should concern policymakers because these institutions are not marginal to Ghana’s education system.
With 645 schools and 468,625 vacancies, they form the largest part of the secondary-school network represented in these categories.
They serve communities across the country and provide access to secondary education for students who may not be able to travel long distances or secure admission into prestigious boarding institutions.
They are therefore essential community educational hubs.
The danger is that they could increasingly become viewed merely as “fallback” schools—institutions chosen only when a candidate fails to obtain a preferred Category A or B placement.
Such a perception can undermine efforts to build strong schools outside the traditional elite institutions.
The answer is not to reduce demand for Category A
The solution is not to discourage candidates from seeking Category A schools. Their preference is understandable.
Parents want schools with strong academic records, qualified teachers, good laboratories, libraries, ICT facilities and conducive learning environments.
The real policy question is why those characteristics cannot be made more widely available.
If Category B and C schools are brought closer to the standards of Category A institutions, the intense pressure on the elite schools could gradually ease.
Candidates would have more confidence that they could obtain a quality education regardless of where CSSPS places them.
Resources must follow disadvantage
The distribution of educational resources therefore requires careful reconsideration.
Schools serving communities with the greatest disadvantages should not necessarily receive the least support. They may require more.
Category C schools in particular need targeted interventions in laboratories, libraries, ICT facilities, classrooms, dormitories, teacher accommodation and staffing.
But infrastructure alone will not solve the problem.
New buildings without teachers and learning materials will not produce better examination results.
Laboratories without qualified science teachers will not transform science education.
ICT laboratories without electricity, connectivity, maintenance and teachers capable of integrating technology into instruction will have limited impact.
Similarly, improved classrooms will not automatically close learning gaps created during basic education.
The intervention must therefore be comprehensive.
Strengthening the basic-school foundation
The starting point must be the public basic school system.
If Ghana wants fewer students to enter senior high school with serious learning deficits, it must improve the quality of teaching and learning at the primary and junior high school levels.
That means ensuring adequate numbers of qualified teachers, appropriate teaching and learning materials, functional classrooms, libraries, ICT facilities and other basic educational resources.
Students must leave basic school with strong literacy, numeracy and problem-solving skills.
Otherwise, the secondary-school system will continue to inherit learning gaps that are increasingly difficult to correct within three years.
WASSCE failure is a system issue
The country’s WASSCE performance should therefore be examined as the outcome of an entire education system rather than as a simple test of whether individual students studied hard enough.
A student who spends years in an under-resourced basic school, receives limited access to learning materials, enters senior high school with weak foundations and is subsequently placed in a school struggling with teachers and facilities faces a fundamentally different educational experience from a student who moves through well-resourced institutions.
Both may sit the same WASSCE. Both may be expected to meet the same academic standards.
But the conditions under which they prepare for the examination are not necessarily the same.
This inequality of opportunity is at the heart of the problem.
The numbers reveal what parents already know
The CSSPS figures essentially capture the collective judgement of hundreds of thousands of families.
The 313,283 applicants competing for 76,417 Category A places are signalling that they believe these schools offer the strongest educational opportunities.
The 176,614 applicants for 250,366 Category B places suggest that these schools are reasonably attractive but do not command the same level of confidence.
And the 123,577 applicants for 468,625 Category C places demonstrate the extent to which candidates are reluctant to choose institutions perceived to have weaker academic environments and fewer resources.
The resulting gaps are 236,866 places in Category A that cannot accommodate demand, 73,752 unused places in Category B and 345,048 unused places in Category C.
These are not merely placement statistics. They are indicators of public confidence in different parts of Ghana’s secondary education system.
A different measure of success
The ultimate objective should therefore be to make school category less important to a student’s academic destiny.
A child should not have dramatically different chances of succeeding at WASSCE simply because the CSSPS system places that child in a Category C rather than a Category A school.
The long-term measure of educational reform should be whether Ghana can create strong teaching and learning environments across all categories.
Category A schools will continue to be highly sought after as long as they maintain their academic records and superior facilities.
But if Category B and C schools receive the teachers, laboratories, libraries, ICT facilities, learning materials, accommodation and sustained investment they need, the quality gap can narrow.
More importantly, students from poorly resourced basic schools can be given a genuine opportunity to recover lost ground.
Until that happens, the country risks treating the symptoms rather than the cause of poor WASSCE performance.
The students sitting the examination may be the ones receiving the failing grades, but the roots of those failures can stretch back years—to classrooms without adequate resources, schools without enough teachers, laboratories without equipment, libraries without books and communities where educational opportunities remain significantly weaker than those available elsewhere.
The challenge for Ghana, therefore, is not simply to ask why candidates are failing WASSCE.
It is to ask whether the education system has provided them with the teachers, facilities, materials and learning conditions required to succeed.
