A growing number of reports have cast a grim shadow over Ghana’s treatment of citizens deported from the United States this year, with disturbing allegations of physical abuse, prolonged detention, and denial of legal access upon arrival at Kotoka International Airport.
Human Rights Watch and the Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) have confirmed that at least 27 deportees have filed formal complaints of mistreatment—ranging from beatings and verbal assault to being held for days without communication or contact with lawyers.
Several returnees described being “roughly handled” by security personnel and kept incommunicado in crowded holding rooms.
These revelations have thrown Ghana’s recently enacted Deportee Reception and Protection Act (Act 1123) into disrepute, raising sharp questions about the government’s commitment to basic human rights and due process.
312 Ghanaians deported — and growing concerns
Between January and August 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) deported 312 Ghanaians, marking a 17% increase compared to the same period last year.
What was intended as a lawful repatriation process has now become a diplomatic and moral controversy, with rights groups alleging “systemic abuse and neglect” during post-arrival handling.
Amnesty International Ghana has documented detention periods lasting between 6 and 14 days, with some cases stretching beyond a month—far exceeding the 48-hour limit stipulated by Act 1123.
‘Dumped in Togo’: Disturbing new allegations
In one particularly shocking case, six deportees were allegedly abandoned in Togo in July after officials reportedly told them they were being “transferred to better accommodation.”
Rights monitors and immigration lawyers have condemned the act as a violation of international humanitarian norms.
“The system is broken—uncoordinated, opaque, and inhumane,” said one lawyer involved in the case. “People are being treated as criminals when they should be treated as citizens returning home.”
Interior Ministry confirmed receiving multiple complaints and promised “a full-scale investigation.”
Act 1123 under fire: Law in name only
Passed barely a year ago, Act 1123 was meant to ensure humane reception and reintegration for deportees.
It guarantees access to legal counsel and family contact within 48 hours of arrival, alongside provisions for medical screening and reintegration support.
But legal experts say the law has collapsed in practice.
The Ghana Immigration Service (GIS) has defended its officers, citing logistical constraints.
“We are operating under serious resource limitations,” said a GIS spokesperson.
“Verification, biometric capture, and criminal screening take time. We follow due process within what is practically possible.”
Calls for independent oversight
Civil society groups are now demanding immediate reform.
CDD-Ghana urged the government to “end arbitrary detentions and ensure deportees are not subjected to torture.”
Human Rights Watch has gone further—calling for a temporary suspension of deportations when credible evidence of mistreatment exists.
A coalition of NGOs, including the Ghana Center for Migration Studies, has proposed deploying independent monitors at Kotoka International Airport to oversee deportee processing in real time. Parliament is reportedly considering amendments to Act 1123 that would institutionalize such oversight and expand detainee rights.
“The first 48 hours after arrival determine everything,” said a human rights lawyer representing several deportees.
“That’s when they need medical attention, legal advice, and a chance to call family. Every hour of delay increases their vulnerability to abuse.”
The U.S. Embassy in Accra issued a statement on September 1 urging Ghana to uphold its obligations under the UN Convention Against Torture, while the African Union Commission on Migration announced plans to conduct a joint review with the U.S. of Ghana’s repatriation system later this year.
A system crumbling under pressure
About 35% of recent deportees have filed formal complaints of mistreatment with the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), which has launched investigations but admits being overwhelmed.
“Our staffing and logistics are limited,” a CHRAJ official said. “But the allegations are serious, and we are following every lead.”
Immigration officials insist that the screening process is essential for national security, but critics counter that security concerns cannot justify prolonged detentions and abuse.
If deportations continue at the current rate, Ghana could receive close to 500 returnees by the end of 2025—the highest number in over a decade.
Experts say this moment will define Ghana’s credibility as a democracy that respects human rights
